![]() ![]() "What's our expectation of something that's at the very edge? Do we want to demand that it's got to be perfect? … Or do we, as a society and as a legal system, want to say to people, 'You're on the edge and the edge is always a little bit dangerous?'"Ĭonley and other lawyers agreed that Judge Margaret Seymour's decision sends a message to future plaintiffs' lawyers that a case dealing with cutting-edge medical issues, such as genetic variant classification, is going to be expensive and difficult to win. ![]() At a time of rapid growth in the genetic testing industry, while standards of care are still evolving, the potential impact of this case on the field has been analyzed and debated in academic journals, at industry meetings, and within classrooms.Īmy Williams and her child were at the "very edge of current medical practice," reflected John Conley, a law professor specializing in intellectual property and biotechnology at the University of North Carolina. Williams v Quest/Athena, a case that has been ongoing since 2016 in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina ( see past coverage), struck a nerve with the genetic testing community by raising questions about what the standard of care is and ought to be for determining the clinical significance of genetic variants and communicating that information to doctors and patients. NEW YORK – A federal district court judge in South Carolina granted summary judgement in favor of Quest Diagnostics last week, unconvinced by the plaintiff's argument that a genetic test result provided for a young boy more than a decade earlier could have caused his death. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |